Breaking Free from Perfectionism: Embrace the Power of 'Good Enough'

12/13/2023

Reid Hoffman, the founder of LinkedIn, once famously quipped, "If you are not embarrassed by the first version of your product, you've launched too late." His words ring particularly true in a world where the pursuit of perfection often overshadows the practicality of 'good enough'. As a scientist and a self-confessed perfectionist, I've often found myself spending hours tweaking graphs until they look 'just right'. The drive to refine every detail, from the color scheme to the axis labels, can be all-consuming. Similarly, the process of writing and rewriting articles, striving for the perfect turn of phrase or the most comprehensive explanation, is a very familiar battle.

While aspiring for excellence is admirable, an obsession with perfection can be a counterproductive trap. Let's explore why embracing 'good enough' is surprisingly effective.

Perfectionism: The Hidden Costs

Perfectionism, at its core, appears to be a relentless quest for excellence. It compels us to push boundaries and strive for the best. Yet, this pursuit is fraught with hidden costs. It brings stress, burnout, and often a lingering dissatisfaction with our work. In the scientific community, where trial and error are foundational, an obsession with perfection can ironically hinder progress.

The Practicality of 'Good Enough'

Contrary to some beliefs, 'good enough' is not synonymous with mediocrity or laziness. It's a practical, efficient approach, recognizing when further effort yields diminishing returns. I've seen researchers delay paper submissions, painstakingly trying to perfect every aspect. This hesitation to seek peer review and share findings can hinder the progress of valuable scientific discourse. Ironically, even with all the extra polishing, it doesn't shield us from the inevitable critique of "Reviewer 2", who, as any scientist knows, has a knack for scrutinizing our work with a fine-tooth comb!

Flexibility in Imperfection

There's a liberating flexibility in accepting 'good enough'. It allows us to view mistakes as learning opportunities rather than failures. In science, where theories are continually evolving, this flexibility is vital. It opens the door to innovative thinking and new discoveries that might otherwise be missed in the pursuit of flawless work.

Balancing Stress and Creativity

As a recovering perfectionist, embracing 'good enough' has personally helped me manage stress and anxiety. It fosters a healthier balance between work and life, and my long-term productivity and creativity has increased sevenfold. It's not about lowering standards, but rather understanding that chasing an elusive perfection often detracts from our goals.

Finding the Middle Ground

It is important to strike a balance. It's about striving for excellence while recognizing when efforts have reached a point of sufficiency. This balance is particularly crucial in science and science communication. We aim to present information accurately and engagingly, not getting lost in the quest for a flawless narrative or the perfect graph.

While there's a time and place for perfectionism, the concept of 'good enough' often presents a more sustainable and productive approach to work and life. It reminds us that in the pursuit of the perfect, the power of 'good enough' should not be underestimated. 

Remember, the best scientific paper is a submitted one!